------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-11-08 
02:49 -------
Man this is a semi hard problem, I could figure out where the call expression 
is built but we patch it up 
which makes it harder (maybe we should pass a pointer to the tree which we 
patch up and then change 
it to a nop).

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17187

Reply via email to