------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 02:49 ------- Man this is a semi hard problem, I could figure out where the call expression is built but we patch it up which makes it harder (maybe we should pass a pointer to the tree which we patch up and then change it to a nop).
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17187