https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82235

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Max Enrico Winkler from comment #6)
> Also ran into another case where GCC doesn't consider explicit copy
> constructors.
> Should be valid according to
> https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.lambda.capture#15.

That looks like a different issue dealing with lambda captures; while this one
deals with arrays.

Reply via email to