https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82235
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Max Enrico Winkler from comment #6) > Also ran into another case where GCC doesn't consider explicit copy > constructors. > Should be valid according to > https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.prim.lambda.capture#15. That looks like a different issue dealing with lambda captures; while this one deals with arrays.
