https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123358
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > I’d suggest to work around in gimplification (which might be what makes this > addressable). Otherwise we’d need to make sure to put address taken > CONST_DECL in the constant pool when EXPAND_MEMORY? No, it's already addressable, otherwise adding a CONST_DECL case on line 8311 of gimplify.cc would probably be sufficient.
