https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123377
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > The difference is `--param logical-op-non-short-circuit=0` vs `--param > logical-op-non-short-circuit=1` checked on x86_64 and powerpc64-linux-gnu. That certainly rings a bell! > What I am going to do is create a new version which sets `--param > logical-op-non-short-circuit=0` and the original will be for `--param > logical-op-non-short-circuit=1`. > > I don't think there is a target supports that is for > logical-op-non-short-circuit either. I am not sure if there should be one > which is why my suggestion is to create 2 testcases out of this one and > xfail the one for `logical-op-non-short-circuit=1` case. At least then we > have better control at when things fail/pass. Sounds good. Thanks!
