https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=123102
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|[16 Regression] [ARM] |[ARM] Different runtime
|Different runtime with -O1 |with -O1 for csmith code
|for csmith code |
--- Comment #6 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
But it's not a 16 regression AFAICT? It fails for >=11.5.0 (and I can't test
older) as I said earlier.
It may be an old regression but that hasn't yet been established.
