https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112630

--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> Let's reopen this as it wasn't fixed by the patch for Bug 111641

Thanks!  I look at non-regressions at most once a year, unless there's like >10
of them at the same time.  Fixing these would handle 6 of the "# of unexpected
failures 27" for cris-elf libstdc++.

Reply via email to