------- Additional Comments From anlauf at hep dot tu-darmstadt dot de 2004-11-03 00:09 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I think this is the same as PR 18023.
Well, actually I get slightly different line numbers with my example and the example of PR 18023 (1982 vs. 1986). Maybe they're related, maybe not. Cheers, -ha -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18283
