https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112914
--- Comment #8 from Filip Kastl <pheeck at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Filip Kastl from comment #7) > But I'm inclined to close this PR anyway. As Richi has noted before and one > can see from the graph, cactusADM's exec time is very sensitive to minor > changes to the binary. And since this slowdown happened so long ago, I > don't think we can be sure that it didn't get fixed since. Therefore I don't think anyone will want to chase down this slowdown.
