------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-11-01 02:29 ------- (In reply to comment #3)
> Zdenek, two questions: > - Aren't ivtmp.128 and ivtmp.124 duplicates? Uhm, forget about this :) > - Since ivtmp.128 behaves exactly like pathp, there is a way to at least preserve the > variable name so that the code is easier to read? This would be still cool -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18241
