https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122172
--- Comment #7 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > We could also just do this: [patch elided] > Any private ports with custom atomic_word.h files would need to update them, > but that would be fine, I think. Thanks for the quick response. I prefer something like the above, not liking silencing warnings. I'll test this and post a patch, unless you've already done this of course... (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > We should also care whether > _Atomic_word is a plain integer type. ...or is some other stuff needed too? (Still testing the above patch.)
