https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159
--- Comment #8 from Christoph & Ursula Grein <[email protected]> --- Here you are. Am 05.10.2025 um 20:28 schrieb ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122159 > > --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> --- >> As I'm keeping track of old reports and I now have a new compiler >> version, I just retested the few last open reports and found those here >> still existing (others were fixed). Since this is a new open forum where >> one can discuss reports, I just rereported to see what will happen. > Well, not really, this is the Bugzilla database of the GCC project, which has > existed for many, many years. We're not interested in bug reports for old > issues that have already been reported elsewhere and that nobody cares about. 122160: That's interesting that nobody cares for a rule that has existed from the early beginnings. > PR ada/122161 might be worth investigating, once the instructions for > reporting > GNAT bugs are followed and a reproducer is attached to the PR. I do hope I made no mistake. There's now the reproducer for 122161 as an attachment.
