https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122096
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3) > > > I am not sure what more should be done here since -O3/-Ofast is > > defined/documtned as it might increase the code size without any gain over > > -O2. > > It is not a comparison to -O2 here, but -Ofast itself. Understood but I am just pointing out why -Ofast can increase in code size over time sometimes without any performance improvements.
