------- Additional Comments From mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 17:02
-------
Nathan, this is a result of your change to limit the maximum size of a thunk.
If we're going to keep that limit, we need to have a sorry() somewhere when
making a bigger thunk. Or, we could restore the ability to use a full "tree" as
the THUNK_FIXED_OFFSET.
(I can't remember how that discussion played out on the lists; my preference, I
think would be to allow an unbounded thunk size.)
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |nathan at codesourcery dot
| |com
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |nathan at codesourcery dot
|dot org |com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18143
