https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121652
--- Comment #21 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #19) > Yeah I was just pointing a different/orthogonal potential existing issue. > That current __builtin_isnan() can potentially raising an FP exception > (Invalid op). This could be fine for its intended usage in round builtin, > but not sure if that is fine as a general API / implementation agreement etc. That is PR 66462.
