------- Additional Comments From horst dot reiterer at fabasoft dot com 2004-10-28 10:50 ------- (In reply to comment #0) > /* CASE 1: non-default constructor > (...) > /* CASE 2: default constructor
'Constructor' was of course a typo, should have been 'destructor' -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18194