------- Additional Comments From horst dot reiterer at fabasoft dot com  2004-10-28 
10:50 -------
(In reply to comment #0)
>   /* CASE 1: non-default constructor
>   (...)
>   /* CASE 2: default constructor

'Constructor' was of course a typo, should have been 'destructor'

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18194

Reply via email to