https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121879

--- Comment #2 from Joseph S. Myers <jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Furthermore, as I've noted before, the Solaris definition is invalid because
the C standard requires int8_t to be a signed integer type and while char
behaves like either signed char or unsigned char, it's not a "signed integer
type" or "unsigned integer type" as defined in the C standard.

Reply via email to