https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103944
--- Comment #20 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19) > It makes use of `exit(0)` in a position that one needs to use `_exit(0)`; > making that amendment on x86_64 repeatably resolves this. x86_64-darwin17 - I have not tested more widely yet.
