https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121705
Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #9 from Nathaniel Shead <nshead at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Fixed. It's worth noting that due to how the language behaves this is still
somewhat fragile; if we never have a non-dependent use of the operators exposed
from the purview then they'll be discarded and the error will return. If that
happens perhaps even a non-exported 'using' in the module purview would suffice
to fix the issue.