https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121595
--- Comment #5 from Matteo Nicoli <matteo.nicoli001 at gmail dot com> --- Created attachment 62175 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62175&action=edit A patch to fix 121595 I attached a patch for this issue; Hope I haven't violated the coding standards. I added a couple of tests file in gcc.dg. Probably I should have added more optimizations in dg-options (currently I only have -O2). Should I create a different file for each dg-options combination? p.s. I notices that in main branch there are a few test failures (3 in gcc and 3 in g++). Here's the summary of my test execution (without my changes): ``` FAIL: gcc.dg/pr96392.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized " \\+ " FAIL: gcc.dg/pr96392.c scan-tree-dump-not optimized " \\- " FAIL: gcc.dg/vla-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized " s=> i" 2 === gcc Summary === # of expected passes 40822 # of unexpected failures 3 # of expected failures 530 # of unsupported tests 349 /build/gcc/xgcc version 16.0.0 20250821 (experimental) (GCC) === g++ Summary === # of expected passes 157314 # of unexpected successes 3 # of expected failures 879 # of unsupported tests 1184 /build/gcc/xg++ version 16.0.0 20250821 (experimental) (GCC) ``` All my test passed.
