https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104116
--- Comment #1 from Avinash Jayakar <avinashd at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Hi Jakub,
This bug is mainly for the fortran compiler right.
- Is there a way to reproduce it for c, since it only has an equivalent for mod
operator and not the modulo?
- For this issue, do I have to revert the commit in gcc/optabs-tree.cc, so that
the vector instruction for the floor mod operator is generated as follows
vect__3.11_22 = vect__2.7_15 %[fl] { 39, 39, 39, 39 };
and then handle the expansion of the floor mod?
Or do it directly in the tree-vect-patterns.cc such that following is generated
vect__3.11_22 = vect__2.7_15 % { 39, 39, 39, 39 }; // normal modulo
... add instructions to handle the signed case?
