https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121488
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Mon, 11 Aug 2025, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121488 > > --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > > Fixed on trunk. > > > > Thanks for the fix, the testcase from PR 92645 looks much improved now. > > > > There is still one case which seems to be missed: > > > Let me file this as a seperate bug. > > I see what happens now, it is basically PR 121405 but the need to take 2 fre > to > do the optimization. We only get that form of what PR 121405 looks like > originally at fre5 and that produces the BIT_FIELD_REF but we don't have > another fre afterwards to fix comment #5. Can you extract a testcase? It might be possible to do this in one step.
