[Bug middle-end/121470] (unsigned short)0x8000 is handled unexpectedly; due to the way const_int is handled

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121470

--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #7)
> Please stop the vandalism.  This is NOT a dup.

How is it not?
(unsigned char)0x80 vs (unsigned short)0x8000 that is the only difference
between the two bug reports?