https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120510
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #9 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Setting milestone to 16.0 as it's fixed there first.
(In reply to uecker from comment #1)
> A user visible bug is this, which is a regression since GCC 14.
>
> int f(int [_Atomic]);
> int f(int [_Atomic]);
> int f(int [_Atomic]);
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/fK8e5K6ax
... but depending on how likely you think it is a user could hit this, we
could/should reopen it as a regression, even if we're not likely to backport
the fix.
