https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121434
--- Comment #5 from Jean-Yves Lefort <jylefort at gmail dot com> --- I see. Well, it's not very important. On this 80k+ lines codebase gcc is literally twice as slow as clang to build the entire thing (if only that). I just have a CI with a gcc build just, for, I don't know which reason exactly. Clang surely isn't a panacea, at all, but you guys do whatever you do with the standard or whatever your interpretation of it is. We're done with gcc, we drop support. Have a nice day.
