https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121274
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Kretz (Vir) <mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Minor correction: Of course the expected result of the second test is vextracti32x4 xmm0, zmm0, 1 ret (i.e. assignment to xmm*0* instead of xmm2)