------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-22 17:13 ------- Not a bug. The "const" in "const rObject" is meaning less in this context (the rObject is already const, references are const, what they refer to are not).
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|critical |normal
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18113
