------- Additional Comments From carlo at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-22 15:39 ------- Ok, thanks Volker. Our last posted crossed, sorry. I'll close the PR because I suppose you are right. I want my library to accept (a + b) * c however, so I guess I'd have to add new operator* prototypes :(.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18110
