https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120980
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> --- On Tue, 8 Jul 2025, tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120980 > > --- Comment #10 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- > Could we perhaps emit additional annotation into gimple to describe what the > vectorizer thinks is safe? And the tool verifies the claims? That's an option, but I didn't want to go there yet - it's a too easy tool to use to silence verifiers and possibly an opportunity to use for things it wasn't designed to.
