https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120929
--- Comment #14 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #13) > Here's a super-minimal test case: > thanks for the smaller testing case, it has the same behavior as the one Sergei provided in comment #7: On X86 machine, even the older GCC reports the overflow error. But on aarch64, only the latest GCC reports the overflow error. it looks like an old bug in object-size.
