https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120358
--- Comment #20 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Holger Hoffstätte from comment #17) > I also get the impression that small.cxx now demonstrates a different > problem than before, but that might just be fallout from what I'm about to > show; this hole goes deeper. I can always re-run it with some specific condition keeping the list comparisons, but given it still kept the QList<QString> and dies w/o -fno-tree-pta, I figured it was the same. But I'm happy to spend some CPU on it if it provides some insight if people want ofc. (I had the same thought and went back and forth on it.) Next step if nobody has any insight yet is to do the debug counter I think and also see if anything leaps out from dumps, now that the file is much smaller.
