https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120790
--- Comment #2 from Simon Sobisch <simonsobisch at gnu dot org> --- (In reply to James K. Lowden from comment #1) > The local fix allows RECORD SEQUENTIAL instead of LINE SEQUENTIAL > unconditionally. you likely mean that one can use either, because RECORD SEQUENTIAL is identical to SEQUENTIAL in IBM (not with LINE SEQUENTIAL, which I think was what RM/COBOL had this meaning), if not, then please adjust
