https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116400
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Francois-Xavier Coudert from comment #12) > Created attachment 61532 [details] > Regeneration script > > Attached is a shell script, to be placed in libgfortran/, that can be run in > that directory to regenerated all files. If people agree with this approach, > I would then remove the hackish "maintainer mode" code from > libgfortran/Makefile.am, leading to behavior that is identical to other GCC > runtime libraries: > - maintainer mode regenerates automake/autoconf files > - regeneration of library code is done manually by developers, through a > script > > I think this is definitely more robust. Let me know what you think. > > ------------ > > Applying that script should lead to no difference, but it does not :) it > leads to a lot of whitespace changes, demonstrating why we need to change > the current situation is: those whitespace changes, introduced in the m4 > files in this commit > > commit 5e918a4db9e4a5bdbeafec6881fa8b22a55d3789 > Author: Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org> > Date: 2024-09-24 21:59:10 +0200 > > * m4/ifunction.m4: Whitespace fix. > > has not been included in the regenerated files, almost one year later. cool ... what might be nice is to share the list by including it in both the regen script and the Makefile... that seems like it should be possible?
