https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120329
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Dimitar Dimitrov from comment #4) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I assume you mean with -mstrict-align (otherwise STRICT_ALIGNMENT is not > > true for aarch64). > > I'm cross-building for armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf, and STRICT_ALIGNMENT > is true by default. Sorry, I'm not well versed in the ARM variants. Am I > wrong to consider aarch64 equivalent to armv8l? Oh, armv8l is not aarch64; they are 2 different things. armv8l is still the arm (aarch32) backend but defaulting to armv8 little-endian. aarch64 is a totally different backend from the arm backend. yes it is confusing :).
