https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119943
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Summary|-O3 forgets trivial code    |improve function splitting
                   |shift. causing significant  |by sinking expressions
                   |slowdown                    |early on

--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So I suspect you need to mark radixSort as noinline for benchmarking reasons
anyways. Because I suspect radixSort is not going to be inlinable in your non
benchmark code.

Reply via email to