https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104800
--- Comment #21 from Paul McKenney <paulmckrcu at gmail dot com> --- > Given C++ abandoned 'volatile' I would rather suggest to document > better ways of achieving that and if existing ways are too cumbersome > we should see a way to do this without altering behavior on 'volatile' > that has been in use for 50 years. There is a rather large number of instances of "volatile" in the C++ working draft, so although a great many people emphatically dislike "volatile", it seems premature to say that C++ abandoned it. ;-)
