https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119705
--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (Clang fares far better on this, and takes > 50% less memory. I think it's far quicker as well.)
sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs Thu, 10 Apr 2025 01:51:55 -0700
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119705
--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (Clang fares far better on this, and takes > 50% less memory. I think it's far quicker as well.)