https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119696
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Steefel <cfsteefel at arista dot com> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > I am 99% sure this was a fix and the warning is correct now vs what it was > > before and not being hidden. > > yes see PR 70413 which fixes the issue with respect to pointer to member > functions and template decls. To try to clarify this for myself then: If a template instantiation uses a hidden visibility type or pointer-to-member-function, we expect that template instantiation to also receive hidden visibility by default? And thus, the workaround is to explicitly provide default/public visibility from whatever contains or inherits from that template instantiation? Separately for my learning, is there any way to query what visibility gcc assigns to something or debug it?
