[Bug target/105275] [12/13/14/15 regression] 525.x264_r and 538.imagick_r regressed on x86_64 at -O2 with PGO after r12-7319-g90d693bdc9d718

[hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105275

--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
as discussed in PR111551 the SPEC train run does not include hottest loop of
imagick (in ref loop), so we optimize it for size (in particular disable
vectorization) and get poor performance....