https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119386

--- Comment #51 from Alexander Monakov <amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Michael, can you give your ack/nack for Ard's proposal in comment #24 (the
second variant, I guess keying off -m[no-]direct-extern-access doesn't make
sense here). I think it properly addresses what you said in comment #12,
considering how the motivation for PLT avoidance seems lost to history.

(mcount doesn't follow the usual psABI, it must preserve all registers, but
even considering that I still fail to see why it was necessary to avoid PLT for
it)

Reply via email to