[Bug target/115910] [15 Regression] ((unsigned)x)/3 with a range for (unsigned)x that does not have the sign bit set seems to produce much worse code

[jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115910

--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Honza, Uros and/or Roger, any thoughts on this?  One of the few remaining P1s.