https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119513

--- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119513
> 
> Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> Or after running flex use sed to canonicalize the libgcobol/ paths in there
> (guess just
> to relative paths ../../libgcobol/something.h)?

I'm going for the exclusion now, a less fragile fix than sed might be
to ensure the generated files are copied to the srcdir before they
are built for stage2, and removed from the build tree so they are
not picked up from there.  Or that they are always copied from
srcdir if present there, so stage3 builds them from the object dir
as well.

At this point I'm trying to ensure a gcc_release has the generated
files which requries enabling cobol (at least).

Reply via email to