https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118795

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org      |rguenth at gcc dot 
gnu.org
           Keywords|                            |needs-reduction
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(gdb) p debug_generic_expr (treeop2)
{ 0, 0, 0, 0, 4, 4, 4, 4, 8, 8, 8, 8, 12, 12, 12, 12 }
(gdb) p debug_rtx (op0)
(reg:V16QI 173 [ vect__13.7496 ])
$2 = void
(gdb) p debug_rtx (op1)
(reg:V16QI 173 [ vect__13.7496 ])

so it's a quite usual permute.  But possibly we fail to verify we can code-gen
it.

Reply via email to