https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64500
--- Comment #7 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For me, it still looks pretty brutal:
+ 6.47% 6.45% cc1plus cc1plus [.] push_to_top_level
+ 5.34% 5.33% cc1plus cc1plus [.]
get_class_binding_direct
54.77 │ ┌──cmpw $0x2,%dx
0.13 │ ├──je 9bf
0.13 │ │ movzwl %dx,%esi
0.56 │ │ movq %rsi,%rax
│ │ shlq $0x6, %rsi
0.13 │ │ cmpb $0x0,0xc(%rbx,%rsi)
12.94 │ │→ je push_to_top_level
3.14 │ │ movq 0x28(%r14),%r15
3.12 │ │ testq %r15,%r15
0.06 │ │↑ je 160
│1a8:│ cmpw $0x1,(%r15)
19.08 │ │→ jne push_to_top_level
│ │ cmpq $0x0,0x38(%r15)
0.71 │ │ movzwl %dx,%eax
then
│23d:│ movq 0x30(%r13),%r13
│ ├──testq %r13,%r13
│ └──jne 136
but let's see if Andi can reproduce that.
