https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119244
--- Comment #26 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Also .. I'm a bit fuzzy still about the absolute requirements. Is there any specific reason (apart from "people don't like it") that this would not work with native __ibm128 long double? granted, at present the FE-side literals might need some TLC.. but that's overdue for __ibm128 anyway... and the format is not going away as fast as constexpr is growing.
