https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116398
--- Comment #26 from Segher Boessenkool <segher at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #23) > Yeah, I'd wondered about limiting it an all cases too. Definitely seems > worth trying. But given that we're in stage 4, maybe it would make sense to > apply the limit only to the "newly re-enabled" cases for GCC 15 and consider > a universal limit for GCC 16. Yup. But it help to think about what we want to do within a year now, already, too, even if we cannot *actually* do it completely yet. > > > Does this seem like a plausible approach? I'm going to be away for the > > > next > > > couple of weeks so wouldn't be able to take it further for a while. > > > > Do you see time to still post the patch today? > I'll be disappearing very soon, so don't have time to do a test run. > > > If not, I'll pick it up. > Thanks, that'd be great. So, the one thing I really worry about a bit: will everything still work if we can lose some log_links in some (unusual) cases? Or does anything rely on that never happening. So I've got some more reading to do :-)
