https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112960
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek <ja...@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aa247ea8c3e443a6d60f382e2db2ef5c0069f879 commit r15-7888-gaa247ea8c3e443a6d60f382e2db2ef5c0069f879 Author: Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> Date: Fri Mar 7 16:35:11 2025 +0100 docs: Attempt to clarify complex literal suffixes [PR112960] This attempts to clarify Complex literal suffixes in the documentation. 2025-03-07 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> PR c/112960 PR c/117029 * doc/extend.texi (Complex): Add I and J suffixes to the list of complex suffixes, adjust for all of those being part of ISO C2Y, clarify that for -fno-ext-numeric-literals none of those are recognized as GNU extensions and for C++14 i is considered UDL even for -fext-numeric-literals when <complex> is included.
