https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119132
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I am sorry but NO.
Why write `&a->array[size]` rather than `&a->array[0] + size` because it easier
to understand what is going on with `&a->array[size]`.
Also this is not strict bounds but rather non-C bounds.
This will break very well defined C code and is really unacceptable to call
something which is well defined to be even have the name of strict.
