[Bug libstdc++/104606] [11 Regression] comparison operator resolution with std::optional and -std=c++20

[redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104606

--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That seems like a more reliable fix than the mysterious reordering of the
template args. Would you like to send it to the lists and push it?