https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118819

Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
That is true, but I've added the
r15-7374-g886ce970eb096bb302228c891f0c8a889c79ad40
change which might trigger this because it will use those
-9223372036854775807ish offsets from sp.

So perhaps
--- gcc/alias.cc.jj     2025-01-02 11:23:24.000000000 +0100
+++ gcc/alias.cc        2025-02-25 12:43:16.655507666 +0100
@@ -2537,12 +2537,14 @@ memrefs_conflict_p (poly_int64 xsize, rt
            {
              if (poly_int_rtx_p (y1, &cy1))
                return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x0, ysize, y0,
-                                          c - cx1 + cy1);
+                                          (poly_uint64) c - cx1 + cy1);
              else
-               return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x0, ysize, y, c - cx1);
+               return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x0, ysize, y,
+                                          (poly_uint64) c - cx1);
            }
          else if (poly_int_rtx_p (y1, &cy1))
-           return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x, ysize, y0, c + cy1);
+           return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x, ysize, y0,
+                                      (poly_uint64) c + cy1);

          return -1;
        }
@@ -2563,7 +2565,8 @@ memrefs_conflict_p (poly_int64 xsize, rt

       poly_int64 cy1;
       if (poly_int_rtx_p (y1, &cy1))
-       return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x, ysize, y0, c + cy1);
+       return memrefs_conflict_p (xsize, x, ysize, y0,
+                                  (poly_uint64) c + cy1);
       else
        return -1;
     }
@@ -2643,7 +2646,7 @@ memrefs_conflict_p (poly_int64 xsize, rt
       poly_int64 cx, cy;
       if (poly_int_rtx_p (x, &cx) && poly_int_rtx_p (y, &cy))
        {
-         c += cy - cx;
+         c += (poly_uint64) cy - cx;
          return offset_overlap_p (c, xsize, ysize);
        }

Or just do it for the c - cx1 + cy1 and c += cy - cx; cases?

Reply via email to