https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118981
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > init_priority attribute should most likely link back to the constructor > > function attribute for the description of the priority . > > And the constructor attribute docs should mention 101-65535. The valid range > for user code and the reserved range should both be stated together, not > split across two locations. let me file that as a seperate bug; I might get to doing that next week or so.
